On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:33 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: > Thank you Mojca, it seems to make sense all of a sudden: I think > those > two accents are simply a mistake, and we should replace the > <upsilon, accent> > sequence by the appropriate Unicode character. That's what Alexej > Kryukov > has done in his antomega package (see lines 1271 and 1816 of TeX > Live's > texmf-dist/tex/lambda/antomega/ograhyph4.tex). Thomas?
That was my guess too, and I simply remapped those two patterns. They are simple typos: > l. 1739 >e3s2ou': should have been >e3s2o'u > l. 1194 >a2n1wdu': should have been >a2n1wd'u With the nifty remap feature, we can just substitute the correct value. Thanks for investigating! Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
