On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 2008-04-05 um 17:08 schrieb David: >>> >>> (3) >>> \startitemize[n] >>> Numbered itemizations suddenly(?) start with 0 - as this may be >>> suitable for programmers, but it's, ehm, a bit unusual in every other >>> context. >> >> I don't have the final answer on this, but I have run into this >> "starts >> with zero" problem when my corresponding \stopitemize is missing or >> not >> in the correct place. > > Ah, sorry - I spoke too soon: > It happened only with "texexec --once"
That is understandable. ConTeXt now allows \setupitemize[n,reverse] to set up numbers in the reverse order. This also means that ConTeXt needs to run two times to get the numbering right. Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
