Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisał(a): > > Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: > > > Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer > > napisał(a): > >>> Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though, > >>> that > >>> the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange > >>> thing. > >> > >> You should come to BachoTeX. In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and > >> Bogusław > >> Jackowski started their talk about TeX Gyre by screaming "Full > >> compatibility means no progress!" at the audience :-) > > > > I know that, I read some of the GUST people papers;). I thought, > > however, that it wouldn't influence my documents *so much*;). > > LuaTeX did not always behave like pdfTeX and if you want the same result > in your document as in the past, don't switch. The different code for > MkII and > MkIV are another reason for different output in a few cases.
Well, since I'm really a beginner, I don't have much ConTeXt documents. So I guess the sooner I switch, the better - especially that MkIV is better for my itemizations;). > > Wolfgang > Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) 888 * Nie lękaj się * Ja zawsze będę z Tobą! ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
