2009/3/16 Marko Schütz <markoschu...@web.de>: > Dear Luigi, > > At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:06:56 +0100, > luigi scarso wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Marko Schütz <markoschu...@web.de> wrote: >> > Dear All, >> > >> > I have some small diagrams I created with MetaPost in 2005. Just >> > recently I wanted to re-run the build of the PDF. It produced a PDF >> > but the typography looks awful. so I compared (diff) with the previous >> > intermediate files and found that the EPS files produced by the mpost >> > run are identical up to timestamps and that it's only the last step >> > epstopdf that uglifies the output. I'm suspecting the fault to be with >> > the ghostscript or the font installation. Maybe someone here has seen >> > this and knows the fix? >> Can you also try with epstpdf of latest TeXLive ? >> or see here >> http://www.mail-archive.com/ctan-...@dante.de/msg02109.html > > thank you very much for the hint. Unfortunately, that did not solve > the problem. > > It turns out I guessed right: the problem was with ghostscript and > font installation. Ghostscript was not knowing about the type1 fonts > in the tex installation. > > I found Fontmap.cmr on CTAN and its instructions helped me solve the > problem. ok
Are you sure that it'a appropriate for this mailling list ? It seems more a latex problem than a context mkii /mkiv minimals problem . Or, how do you do it in context mkiv ? -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
