On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:45, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> out of curiosity I have tried the latest current. Is the command
>> \setupheadnumber[section][6]
>> now invalid on purpose or is there a simple way to fix it?
>
> i dunno, i see the command but never tested if it works (might not be
> adapted to some changes); do you need it urgently?
No, luckily the document works with mkii :)
>> One more problem:
>>
>> \setuphead[section][textstyle=\ss\bfc] % combined with numbercommand=
>> \setuphead[subsection][style=\ss\bfb]
>> \starttext
>> \section{abcdef}
>> \subsection{abcdef}
>> \stoptext
>>
>> Subsection gets typeset with \bfc while in mkii it uses \bfb.
>
> hm, needs checking but i think that i changed the default chain a bit ...
> this is debatable
I don't claim that the way I use it is the right one.
This is just my guess why it happens: usually textstyle and style
would exclude one another (no reason why one would use both for the
same section). The problem is that textstyle is inherited from section
to subsection, and then subsection has both style and textstyle and
textstyle takes precedence over style.
A human being would expect the latest settings "style=" of subsection
to be obeyed, not the inherited conflicting value, though this might
be a bit tricky to change.
Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
