On Fri, Mar 19 2010, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> I know why i works it works when you write the setup before the table
> and how to solve it in the ugly way (don’t use this solution) but I can't
> provide a fix for this.
Ok. So it's no real bug, but just a consequence of the design?
> What you can do to separate setup and code you can write
>
> \bTD
> {
> \setups[inner-table]
> \bTABLE
Thanks. Indeed, there is no problem to put the setups outside, since I must
use grouping anyway.
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
