Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
the previous format.
Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
Another problem fixed by my patch:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula 1=1\stopformula
\ineq[first]
\stoptext
printed "1", not "equation 1".
This problem is still there and needs fixing, but I think your patch
has a bug (possibly because of the already done other bugfix).
After patching, I think \doinatreferenceone should look like
this:
\def\doinatreferenceone
{\ifx\next\bgroup
\afterassignment\doinatreferenceonetwo
\expandafter\leftreferencetoks
\else\ifx\textofreference\empty
\leftreferencetoks\emptytoks
\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\dodoinatreferencenone
\else
\leftreferencetoks{\textofreference}%
\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\doinatreferenceonetwo
\fi\fi}
Best wishes,
Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
