taco wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>> It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
>>> the previous format.
>> Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
> This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
I shall test once this beta will be published.
>> Another problem fixed by my patch:
>>
>> \definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
>> \starttext
>> \placeformula[first]
>> \startformula 1=1\stopformula
>> \ineq[first]
>> \stoptext
>> printed "1", not "equation 1".
>
> This problem is still there and needs fixing, but I think your patch
> has a bug (possibly because of the already done other bugfix).
>
> After patching, I think \doinatreferenceone should look like
> this:
>
> \def\doinatreferenceone
> {\ifx\next\bgroup
> \afterassignment\doinatreferenceonetwo
> \expandafter\leftreferencetoks
> \else\ifx\textofreference\empty
> \leftreferencetoks\emptytoks
> \expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\dodoinatreferencenone
> \else
> \leftreferencetoks{\textofreference}%
> \expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\doinatreferenceonetwo
> \fi\fi}
With published beta, I didn't need these \expandafter, but probably I missed
some corner case, or they're needed with your internal fix.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
