Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a): > On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote: > > Hullo, > > > > from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on > > wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote > > instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote. > > > > If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as > > expected. > > > > Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid? > > sounds like a but or maybe a side effect of how you use the footnote; in > mkiv footnotes are stored differently (and can actually be accessed in > many ways) .. so a small test file is needed that shows the problem
\starttext
Something something\footnote{dark side}
Something something\footnote{complete}
\stoptext
Something as simple as that already triggers it in my case.
I'm using minimals from 2010.06.18 11:26.
Cheers,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849 552
www: http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
