On 29-10-2010 12:52, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,

from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on
wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote
instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote.

If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as
expected.

Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid?

sounds like a but or maybe a side effect of how you use the footnote; in
mkiv footnotes are stored differently (and can actually be accessed in
many ways) .. so a small test file is needed that shows the problem

\starttext

Something something\footnote{dark side}

Something something\footnote{complete}

\stoptext

Something as simple as that already triggers it in my case.

I'm using minimals from 2010.06.18 11:26.

first update then

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to