On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz <thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote: > > On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Jon Crump wrote: > >> My thought, ill-informed perhaps, was simply for clarity: to make it >> clear that I'm using the same value in both \note[] and \footnote[]. >> In any case, sadly, using what you suggest still gets me the same >> result. > > I get correct output here. Try deleting the doublefoot.tuc file and rerunning > ConTeXt.
mysterious: I tried that and got the same output; both for your version and mine attached .tex and .pdf
doublefoot.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
doublefoot.tex
Description: TeX document
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
