even more minimal, I tried running context on this:
\starttext
some text with footnote\footnote[f]{footnote text} \\
some text with reference\note[f]
\stoptext
and got the same phenomenon:
some text with footnote 1
some text with reference ??
Something about the \note[] mechanism I'm not getting?
Jon
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jon Crump <jjcr...@uw.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
> <thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Jon Crump wrote:
>>
>>> My thought, ill-informed perhaps, was simply for clarity: to make it
>>> clear that I'm using the same value in both \note[] and \footnote[].
>>> In any case, sadly, using what you suggest still gets me the same
>>> result.
>>
>> I get correct output here. Try deleting the doublefoot.tuc file and
>> rerunning ConTeXt.
>
> mysterious: I tried that and got the same output; both for your version and
> mine
>
> attached .tex and .pdf
>
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
