On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > On 1-2-2011 6:53, Vnpenguin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 22:28, Hans Hagen<pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: >>> >>> On 31-1-2011 7:11, Hans van der Meer wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for changing things that way between one and the other. I am >>>> starting to get a bit choleric about all things that constantly seem >>>> broken >>>> with the next update. Sorry for the sour note but these are costing me >>>> hours >>>> to iron out, time I do not have at the moment. >>> >>> well, no one forces you to update betas >>> >>> also, as long as we're in transition to mkiv you can expect an occasional >>> hickup, after all, i have only a few machines to test >> >> It's better to have someone could give you a hand. >> In the long term, something like "Release Team" would be a must for >> ConTeXt development. With this team, we can do some "Unit testing" for >> each release in order to minimize problem. > > to some extend this is what the beta is for ... because mkiv is a moving > target it sort of replaces the current, but if i can imagine that users wait > a few days with updating till there are no problems reported > > concerning testing ... there is a slowly growing test suite, and i guess > that at some point Luigi will run it alongside his module documentation runs > .. you can offer him help with that (sanjoy also has made some test setup) ...mea culpa.... I'm busy with bachotex material --- and a wrong Ubuntu LTS upgrade... -- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
