My update proceedure systematically maintains a previous,
presumably working, copy of the minimals. For this, I run
a script:

#!/bin/sh
cd /usr/local/context
cd beta
echo "*** move current to previous ***"
rsync -av --delete --progress . ../previous
echo "*** update beta ***"
rsync -ptv --progress rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh .
./first-setup.sh --extras=all | tee first-setup.log

This way I limit problems while still working with the latest, greatest
beta version of ConTeXt. When things go wrong with the update,
I simply move "beta" to "new" (or something else) and "previous" to "beta",
my PATH being set to use "beta".

Perhaps others can suggest a better working proceedure.

Of course, when pressed for time, I postpone updating to Hans' latest
so as not to be distracted from the work at hand.

Alan


On Tuesday 01 February 2011 09:43:00 Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1-2-2011 6:53, Vnpenguin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 22:28, Hans Hagen<pra...@wxs.nl>  wrote:
> >> On 31-1-2011 7:11, Hans van der Meer wrote:
> >>> Thanks for changing things that way between one and the other. I am
> >>> starting to get a bit choleric about all things that constantly seem
> >>> broken with the next update. Sorry for the sour note but these are
> >>> costing me hours to iron out, time I do not have at the moment.
> >> 
> >> well, no one forces you to update betas
> >> 
> >> also, as long as we're in transition to mkiv you can expect an
> >> occasional hickup, after all, i have only a few machines to test
> > 
> > It's better to have someone could give you a hand.
> > In the long term, something like "Release Team" would be a must for
> > ConTeXt development. With this team, we can do some "Unit testing" for
> > each release in order to minimize problem.
> 
> to some extend this is what the beta is for ... because mkiv is a moving
> target it sort of replaces the current, but if i can imagine that users
> wait a few days with updating till there are no problems reported
> 
> concerning testing ... there is a slowly growing test suite, and i guess
> that at some point Luigi will run it alongside his module documentation
> runs .. you can offer him help with that (sanjoy also has made some test
> setup)
> 
> in this particular case (adaption of mtxrun) testing is somewhat
> problematic as we need a test-minimal alongside the regular one and that
> might happen when mojca has set up the new machine
> 
> Hans
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to