Am 2011-05-26 um 19:43 schrieb mathew:
Some numbers:
SVG to PDF: Two diagrams, 25k.
SVG to EPS: Same two diagrams, 54k.
Difference: 29k.
Document rendered using the PDFs: 535k.
Document rendered using the EPSs: 463k.
Difference: 72k in the opposite direction.
Be aware that ConTeXt needs to convert EPS (or SVG) to PDF before
including - so providing EPS might elongate processing time.
And PDF sizes depend very much on the used tools, e.g. Acrobat
Distiller PDFs are often smaller than GhostScript PDFs, even if
there's no downgrading of pixel images involved.
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
