On 27.09.2011 14:56, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 09/27/2011 02:51 PM, Meer, H. van der wrote:
My best guess now is the description of the
FUNCTION {format.crossref}
{ "" "\crossref" crossref do.out
}
entry on the .bst file. Probably this generates the bad code leading
to a missing \endcsname.
I do not have time to pay close attention right now, but the .bst has
not changed in years, as far as I know.
Best wishes,
Taco
Maybe the problem is already present for so long. It occurs only if
"title" of an "inproceedings" that has "crossref" set is accessed. The
bibl-*.tex files don't do that.
Stefan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________