On 11/22/2012 10:18 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/21/2012 8:28 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21 2012, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But Peter's idea is also not that bad. The drawback is that the
distribution cannot be moved to a different directory then, but one
could also have combination of both approaches somehow.
Is it worth the trouble to keep setuptex?
Just saying "Please add ... to your PATH" should be enough IMO.
I often use it.
Me too, I have quite a bunch of scripts that are distributed to
online servers that do not all have the same architecture.
Best wishes,
Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
