Hi all,
thanks for your responses.
@Hans: yes, hbar is extremely common in quantum physics, in fact I'd go as far
to say as ubiquitous. It might be considered strange that the glyph doesn't
exist, but it's actually defined in TeX as a ligature:
\def\hbar{{\mathchar'26\mkern-9muh}
I tried defining this but it doesn't work: I still get nothing.
As it happens, \hslash seems to work fine, and in my opinion is a suitable
substitute so I will just
\def\hbar\hslash
(although actually that didn't work, I had to do \def\hbar{\hslash} for some
reason or I got an error in some tikz code I wrote).
Michael
--
Michael Murphy
murphy...@gmail.com
On Saturday, 5 January 2013 at 04:49, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:10:50AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> > It looks like hbar (LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH STROKE 0x127) is not
> > in the math fonts.
>
>
>
> \hbar should be a glyph variant of \hslash (U+0210F), according to STIX
> people, if the font provides such a variant.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
> Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
