On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >>>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex? >>>> >>>> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77 >>>> specific functionality >>>> >>>> there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is already a binary for >>>> windows, as Akira always provides the latest greatest) >>>> >>> I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to >>> be broken. >> >> Which one? 32-bit or 64-bit linux (linux or linux-64)? > > Linux 32-bits is my architecture. > >> I failed to automatically compile 32-bit binaries (and I would have to >> remember how to switch the compiler and simply didn't care enough at >> the time to take the effort + we have problems with weirdly >> misbehaving subversion without proper understanding what could go >> wrong, so some binary builders weren't even able to submit their >> binaries). If that fails it might be due to version mismatch which >> means that I need to build the binary first. > > I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has proliferated to the distribution already.) Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
