On 16 January 2016 at 00:33, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > On 1/15/2016 9:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: >> >> On 01/15/2016 06:58 PM, Kate F wrote: >>> >>> So I see! But many DTDs contain definitions for entities, which I >>> would like to use, rather than repeating those definitions by >>> \xmlsetentity in ConTeXt. Some XML documents also have their own >>> document-specific entities inside the DOCTYPE at the top of the file. >>> >>> For example in legal agreements, I have something like: >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0"?> >>> <!DOCTYPE blah SYSTEM "blah.dtd" [ >>> <!ENTITY us "the company"> >>> <!ENTITY you "the customer"> >>> ]> >>> >>> Where the stuff inside [...] is considered part of a document-specific >>> DTD. >>> libxml2 handles this sort of thing with its "dtdattr" options; I >>> presume lxml has something similar. >> >> >> AFAIK, ConTeXt has its own xml parser based on lua lpeg, see file >> lxml-tab.lua. There is code there that treats entities, but I have never >> used this approach, so you'll probably have to wait till Hans looks at >> your question (or understand the lua code...) > > > i'll come back to it ... fyi: these doctype entities are already parsed in > mkiv .. just not used (or maybe it got lost when fulfilling other wishes) >
Much appreciated, if you would. Thank you! Is it just a case of having that parsing call \xmlsetentity? -- Kate ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
