On 18 January 2016 at 13:30, Thomas A. Schmitz <thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote: > On 01/17/2016 07:24 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> >> it should work in the in beta now
Wonderful! Thank you so much. > Hi Hans, > > now I have a problem :-) What should take precedence if an entity is both > defined in the dtd and as a \xmltexentity? The way I see it, the latter: > e.g., in the DTD, I might declare something for use in a browser but require > a different solution when typesetting with ConTeXt. The latest and greatest > now takes my DTD definitions instead of the \xmltexentities, which did not > happen before. Is that an unwanted side effect or the new default? I was just about to ask the same! I agree that \xmltexentity ought to have precedence. I have an example: <!ENTITY nbsp " "> Which for some reason is being rendered as U+FFFD REPLACEMENT CHARACTER (a question-mark in a diamond). I don't know why that comes out as U+FFFD actually, since if I type a literal non-breaking space character instead, the PDF comes out just as if I'd used ~ in TeX. Maybe that's a bug somewhere? In any case, I think that sometimes it is helpful to override entities specifically for TeX processing, which aren't relevant for processing the XML source in other ways. -- Kate ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________