> On 30 Jan 2019, at 20:57, Paul Schalck <[email protected]> wrote: > > as many critics go towards "I don't see any coherence" or "to me it's just a > random bunch of colored letters" or "it's hard to read the word CONTEXT", > some afterthoughts in that regard (difficulty, randomness). > > Personally, I like visual material that catches my attention, but does not > give all away at first glance. For example a good poster or book cover. It > invites me to spend time on it. And I don't have the feeling that the > designer thinks I'm stupid. ConTeXt is quite sophisticated, its logo can also > be a little bit more complicated than your average sportswear brand.
The E at the center might be switched with the T at center bottom. Then the lower part might be easier to read, and is in line with the original TeX logo, where the E is a lowered capital eta. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
