On 11/12/20 12:24 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 11/11/2020 9:46 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> Hans, > >> Back then, I thought it was an minor improvement. Now I realized that >> this two objects for signature fiels are only valid for Acrobat. > > the other tools should be fixed ... indirect objects are pretty valid
Many thanks for your reply, Hans. I totally agree, these tools need to be fixed. I reported the issue to one of the projects more than two years ago. I’m still waiting for a message about the issue report. >> Would it be possible that signature fields may have only one object, so >> that mupdf-gl and other tools have no problem signing fields PDF >> documents generated by ConTeXt? > all is possible but i'm not sure if i want to uglify the implementation > for the sake of buggy viewers In Windows (and I guess in macOS), saving a copy with Acrobat Reader DC seems to unify both objects. But I’m afraid Acrobat for Linux is too old for that (9.5.5). Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
