On 2/5/2021 11:25 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 5 Feb 2021, at 22:30, Hans Hagen <[email protected]> wrote:
[…]
Is this ok for you?
tex error > tex error on line 6 in file ./oeps.tex: Undefined control
sequence
<line 3.6> \v
4
5 \starttext
6 >> \v
7 \stoptext
8
In that case the error message could say
tex error > tex error on line 6 in file ./oeps.tex: Undefined control
sequence: if you really mean it, then
tex error > add \usemodule[oldschool] at the begiining of your file…
<line 3.6> \v
Sure but then we can as well keep them -) But maybe I will first redo
them in a less old school way.
The reason i ask mostly relates to trying to classify such commands. It
is easy to see that one should not redefine \relax (primitive) or
\framed (permanent core macro) so we can protect these against
overloading, while \temp is supposed to be mutable (\foo_bar are already
hidden from the user to these i can skip).
There are (local) cases where we have \3 defined but what should it be
otherwise? And commands like \n ? Commands like \NC have a meaning that
depend on the specific environment so they change meaning but then still
need to be protected against overload. Most is already dealt with so i'm
now going through left-overs.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
