Am Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2002 10:59 schrieb Hans Hagen: > <authors> > <entry><fname>...</fname><sname>.../sname></entry> > </authors>
No, that doesn't fit. Perhaps <faq author="user"> is better. I'd use your verbose tags only in a user database. > <keywords> > <entry key="xyz">exeizet</entry> > </keywords> > is better since we can then pick up and store the whole lot The bundling is ok, but why should the entry use an option? I understand the keywords only as a help for finding und see no sense in describing them further. > > <section>...</section> > > <subsection>...</subsection> > aren't sections at a higher level here? As I wrote in the other mail, I'd suggest a generic format like "2.1.3" that links to an other database with the titles for 2, 1, and 3. It seems that I must first get some experience with XML before defining a style. I'm thinking always in matters of relational databases, but XML files can't link to others, can they? I hate redundancy. Gr��lis vom Hraban! -- http://www.fiee.net http://www.ramm.ch --- _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
