Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >1. After tinkering I could get the URW stuff working, but I want the > > Adobe. > > the problem is that those fonts are no longer distributed, as well as > that the glyohs widths differ per location
So the URW fonts are better? > in principle it's just a matter of mapping the right names onto Serif > etc, once you know what the filenames are (maybe in some psfonts.map > file you can deduce the raw names) I thought I got them. pdftex is no longer including them, or list them as included. However, in Adobe Acrobat Reader, when I look at the included fonts, the names look like Microsoft TTF names. That it all was a principle of mapping I got :-) Now the correct mapping... -- Live long and prosper, Berend de Boer _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
