On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:03:33 -0700 Matt Gushee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:41:49AM +1300, Berend de Boer wrote: > > > > > in principle it's just a matter of mapping the right names onto Serif > > > etc, once you know what the filenames are (maybe in some psfonts.map > > > file you can deduce the raw names) > > > > I thought I got them. pdftex is no longer including them, or list them > > as included. However, in Adobe Acrobat Reader, when I look at the > > included fonts, the names look like Microsoft TTF names. > > You mentioned tetex, and your e-mail client is GNUS, so I imagine you're > probably running Linux. I don't know if this helps at all, but I just > checked out the fonts in my Acrobat installation (Acrobat Reader 5.0 on > Linux). The fonts are actually PostScript files ... which I guess means > that they are Type 42. You should be able to confirm this with > > less /path/to/Acrobat5/Resource/Font/Arial Acrobat ships the font-outlines but not the font-metrics (AFMs). Thus you can not use them in pdfTeX, or only use them with the metrics from the URW fonts. It is far better to use/embed the URWs directly, since those fonts are real copies of the original Adobe fonts and not Arial-or-something-else variants by Monotype. Jens _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
