On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:30:00 +0100 Denis Roegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 02:14:19PM +0100, Jens-Uwe Morawski wrote: > > So you have to rewrite many parts of metaobj. > > I am actually not sure of that. When I setup options or when I create an object, > I am parsing the options and making a number of assignments. That's basically it. > I think that the changes would be very much isolated. > It would be worth having a look, but I am a bit busy these days. I could > take out of metaobj what has to be changed. There is very little, I think. Our discussion inspired me to try another, string-based keyval implementation. It allows different kind of parameters, so one can mix them all together: YourKeyValFunction "state=start,color=blue","treemode(U)","framed(r),dashes=off" or YourKeyValFunction "state=start,color=blue,dashes=off","treemode(U),framed(r)" i'm currently working on the string-parser and after i've finished some additional macros that make writing key/val macros easier i will post it here. Then we can dicuss the pros and cons and you can pick the package you prefer. Jens _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
