On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:58:05 +0100 Denis Roegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:22:26AM +0100, Jens-Uwe Morawski wrote: > > Is it really a problem to have a dedicated MP-list? Many MP questions are > > not interesting to MF users and vice versa. The new list will be a low > > traffic list. Thus, subscriptions to both should cause not much trouble. > > It's not a problem for me, but since the metafont/metapost list traffic > is already very low, I was wondering whether it would be necessary > to split it. Hmm, it was not a split for me. I've ask in some news groups and mailing lists if somebody can tell me a mailing list for MP. I've never got an answer. > Btw, would metafont questions be accepted on the new list? Dont ask me, i'm not the master of the list. ;) I would accept them, esp since MF and MP share some concepts. I would even accept LaTeX and ConTeXt questions that are related to MetaPost. IMO, we should give this list a chance. There are already 12 subscribers after i've have announced it at TeX-D-L (a german TeX mailing list) yesterday. So, there seems to be some interest. Best, Jens _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
