Hello Igor,

I had the same problem. I got sessions in 2.0 but when I switched to 2.1 RCs 
or 2.1 I got no sessions.

Burton advised me to use the -m  parm. It worked for me! 
I had to use -m "xxx.xxx.xx.0/24,xxx.xxx.xx.0/24,xx.xxx.xx.0/24" and it works 
fine now on the three interfaces I monitor. 

When you say the -m does not work correctly, could you please send the
-m parm you are using and what happens that lets you believe it is not working 
correctly?

Earl

On Monday 15 July 2002 03:39 pm, Igor Schein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that 2.1 is released, I would like  to return to the active TCP
> session problem.  I'm now happily using version 2.0 without -j or -m
> flags and that displays the sessions for me fine,  So the problem is
> obviously not in my setup ( see my previous postings ), but in the
> changed functionality of ntop between versions 2.0 and 2.1.
>
> Here's my final question:  is there a way in 2.1 or will there be a
> way in future releases to get the behavior of version 2.0 as far as
> session display is concerned?  If the answer is no, or there's no
> answer at all, then this thread will be killed de facto, I apologize
> for wasting your time and I'll continue using 2.0 for as long as it
> stays to be the case.
>
> I appreciate Burton's input up to date, but this is a simplilfied
> version of dialog so far:
>
> Me: "Sessions are not displaying"
> Burton: "You need to use -j/-m combination"
> Me: "-j doesn't work at all and -m works incorrectly"
> Burton" "Your setup is wrong".
>
> I hate to sound like I'm whining, but I'd like it to be a bit more
> productive, since I know version 2.0 works with my setup.  Ntop is a
> great product, and I am eager to help its testing, but I've been
> dissapointed so far that my bug report hasn't been recognized as a
> but report at all.
>
> Thanks
>
> Igor
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

_______________________________________________
Ntop-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

Reply via email to