Hello Igor, I have 4 interfaces on the machine where I am running NTOP. I am monitoring 3 class C networks (the 4th is an internal lan). Total traffic volume around 2 megabits.
All four NICS are attached to 'normal' hubs not switches, so for me the -m works fine. Earl On Monday 15 July 2002 04:28 pm, Igor Schein wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 03:59:23PM -0400, Earl C. Terwilliger wrote: > > Hello Igor, > > > > I had the same problem. I got sessions in 2.0 but when I switched to 2.1 > > RCs or 2.1 I got no sessions. > > > > Burton advised me to use the -m parm. It worked for me! > > I had to use -m "xxx.xxx.xx.0/24,xxx.xxx.xx.0/24,xx.xxx.xx.0/24" and it > > works fine now on the three interfaces I monitor. > > > > When you say the -m does not work correctly, could you please send the > > -m parm you are using and what happens that lets you believe it is not > > working correctly? > > When I use -m as you describe above, I do see sessions, but all of > them are displayed as being originated from the same IP address. > Burton said it has to do with mac address getting substituted when a > packet goes from one switch to the other, but it did work fine in > 2.0!! How come the original mac address wasn't getting lost back then? > > Thanks > > Igor > > P.S. How many interfaces do you have on the host where you run > ntop? I have 2, and I suspect that might be preseting a problem > for ntop. > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev _______________________________________________ Ntop-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
