It was a fresh cv pull from 27.07 20:00 GMT I tried. The reports are 'Summary, Hosts', 'IP Summary, Trafic' and 'All Protocols, Traffic' (hope these are all).
Will investigate a litte bit further, I think in 3.0pre1 the behaviour was different. Markus _____________________________ On Saturday 28 February 2004 00:29, Burton M. Strauss III wrote: > Well, there are some places where there is a foreach device loop, but > within a single device those should be totally separate - the data from the > two interfaces should not be commingled. Which report is this? > > If they were deleted, then they were purged as inactive, but I fail to see > why they would be there at all. There was a fix in the cvs a couple of > days ago, where one of the transitions wasn't being done, so items could be > duplicated. Maybe try a fresh pull of the cvs... > > -----Burton > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > > Of Markus Rehbach > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:03 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Ntop-dev] Duplicated name entries in the eth0 host lists > > (orig. from eth0 and NerFlow-Device) > > > > > > Ok, for my understanding: > > > > It is right looking at the eth0 interface to have the name > > resolutions entries > > for the NetFlow-Interface, too (2 hosts, 4 entries, 2 without MAC > > wich are > > 'borrowed' on eth0 from the NetFlow-Interface)? > > > > You are right the -o will avoid the duplicated entries. Perfect that way. > > > > Markus _______________________________________________ Ntop-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
