I'm going to update things so that the <!-- --> entries are generated if you
use the -K flag too.  That way we can see what's really going on.

-----Burton

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Markus Rehbach
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ntop-dev] Duplicated name entries in the eth0 host lists
> (orig. from eth0 and NerFlow-Device)
>
>
> It was a fresh cv pull from 27.07 20:00 GMT I tried. The reports are
> 'Summary, Hosts', 'IP Summary, Trafic' and 'All Protocols, Traffic' (hope
> these are all).
>
> Will investigate a litte bit further, I think in 3.0pre1 the
> behaviour was
> different.
>
> Markus
>
> _____________________________
>
> On Saturday 28 February 2004 00:29, Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
> > Well, there are some places where there is a foreach device loop, but
> > within a single device those should be totally separate - the
> data from the
> > two interfaces should not be commingled.  Which report is this?
> >
> > If they were deleted, then they were purged as inactive, but I
> fail to see
> > why they would be there at all.  There was a fix in the cvs a couple of
> > days ago, where one of the transitions wasn't being done, so
> items could be
> > duplicated.  Maybe try a fresh pull of the cvs...
> >
> > -----Burton
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> > > Of Markus Rehbach
> > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:03 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [Ntop-dev] Duplicated name entries in the eth0 host lists
> > > (orig. from eth0 and NerFlow-Device)
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok, for my understanding:
> > >
> > > It is right looking at the eth0 interface to have the name
> > > resolutions entries
> > > for the NetFlow-Interface, too (2 hosts, 4 entries, 2 without MAC
> > > wich are
> > > 'borrowed' on eth0 from the NetFlow-Interface)?
> > >
> > > You are right the -o will avoid the duplicated entries.
> Perfect that way.
> > >
> > > Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Ntop-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

Reply via email to