***** If ANYONE has successfully created a Solaris VMware machine ***** ***** (oh, yeah, on AMD hardware), please email me off list. *****
Luca: >From below: WRT MAC OS X, I think it is a good idea to create binary packages for rc2 so people can test in that environment also. Win32(Demo) is, I agree, a toss-up. WRT .deb package, having somebody create one for rc2 is again a benefit to wider testing. WRT Win32(MinGW): (1) If Georger can give us instructions and maintain a MinGW binary which follows the releases, that's of benefit and belongs in SourceForge under 'User Contrib'. (2) I agree these changes are not going into baseline until / unless they are packaged properly (i.e. so that they do NOT break VC++ .Net). That's why I'm looking for somebody to take this on - Georger (can't/won't/isn't interested) take this the last mile. Finally, thanks for the confirmation re Solaris. -----Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luca Deri Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ntop-dev] ntop 3.2 roadmap Burton Strauss wrote: <snip/> > Luca - after I upload the .tgz I'll email you and I'll expect you >to create/upload the Windows demo and Mac OS X packages. I'll do this with the final 3.2 <snip /> > We still need somebody willing to create .deb packages. > > This after 3.2 <snip /> > Win32 - Somebody needs to take Georger Araujo's work and package it >for SourceForge (i.e. a prebuilt .zip file of the 3.2rc2 code). An >update to docs/BUILD-MinGW.txt is also in order. > > I would like to avoid this now. The code works perfectly under .NET and I don't want to break it for MinGW. We can postpone it to 3.2.1 <snip /> _______________________________________________ Ntop-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
