"
Don't worry about traffic overhead from netflow. Unless there is some sort of
attack / probe / malware on the net creating/destroying thousands of
connections per second, the overhead is very low - nothing to worry about.
"
Ok thanks, so send netflow packets on the same link that netflow listen
is not a problem?
On 28/01/2011 21:42, Gary Gatten wrote:
I don't know about the "double NAT" issue. We do it ALL the time - it should
be 100% transparent to apps, unless some sort of addressing info is in the packet
payload, and most NAT'ing devices today address NATing that as well.
Anyway, I'll review the link in more detail but some thoughts:
" I want daily and monthly running totals for each port on the RB 250G (ie each
VLAN)"
Running totals of what? If it's basic layer 2/3 info (bytes, packets, etc.)
perhaps snmp would be a better choice? Else, I *think* nTop clusters (I think
they're called clusters now, were communities) will work for you. For each
VLAN you will create a cluster. nTop will then summarize / aggregate data on
cluster (VLAN) boundaries. Then you can drill into the cluster for host level
info - if you wish.
It seems like you're wanting basic network accounting? nTop will do that to
some extent, but was designed to provide greater detail (layer 4+ info at the
host level). There are some args you can start ntop with to track only by
network level - this may work for you as well. It's intended for ISP, Public
NAP's,etc. that don't care to track at the host level but need some detailed
info at the network level.
Don't worry about traffic overhead from netflow. Unless there is some sort of
attack / probe / malware on the net creating/destroying thousands of
connections per second, the overhead is very low - nothing to worry about.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Gould
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ntop] split result by network
This is exactly long the lines of what I'm trying to do as well...
http://home.bowenvale.co.nz/wp/concept.jpg
Except I don't have "ports" on a router, but I'm planning networks on
vlans (per the diagram above).
The RB 750G is a mikrotik router that spits out netflow data. My plan
is to set up vlans to the RB 250G (which is a layer 2 managed switch).
So Vlan 10 - 192.168.1.0/24, Vlan 30 - 192.168.2.0/24, Vlan 30 -
192.168.3.0/24, etc
The reason I'm thinking this is because I don't want the users to run
NAT routers because I'd then end up with double natting, which will
upset some apps.
My current thinking is that perhaps I set up private AS ranges then use
ntop to consolidate the data that way. I want daily and monthly
running totals for each port on the RB 250G (ie each VLAN)
D
On 29/01/2011 5:19 a.m., Gary Gatten wrote:
I think there may be several ways to achieve what you wish. The question is, what
exactly do you want to split? If it's "all" traffic data (detailed), you'll
need netflow with different logical netflow interfaces for each of the three interfaces
you are monitoring. If you just want summary data (bytes and packets Tx and Rx, etc.)
grouped by each network range you are monitoring - you can use clusters / communities;
one for each network range.
You network diagram didn't format clearly for me. If you need additional
assistance, please attach network diagram in a txt file and include what type
of network equipment you have. Or, spell out specifically what problem(s) your
trying to address.
HTH
G
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zorg
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Ntop] split result by network
Hello,
I have a network which looks like this :
____
| 1 |
|___|____________
|
|
____ |
| 2 | | ________
|___|____________|ROUTER|__| NTOP |
| |_place_|
|
____ |
| 3 | |
|___|____________|
1 = 192.168.1.0
2 = 192.168.2.0
3 = 192.168.3.0
NTOP = 192.168.4.0
I would like to monitor traffic from place 1, place 2, place 3 to NTOP
place. Is it possible to split info (as if i had 3 differents
interfaces), it will be a "logical split".
An other solution is to put nprobe/netflow on each 1, 2, 3, and to
create 1 interface by nprobe, but i'm afraid that send netflow traffic
and network traffic on the same link full the link, what do you think
about it?
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop