That was my previous version with same results.

El 04/11/2015 a las 18:06, Joseph Jackson escribió:

Honestly just for troubleshooting purposes I would install just ntopng from http://packages.ntop.org/ stable and see if you are seeing the same resource usage.

I’m running 2.0.151021<https://github.com/ntop/ntopng/commit/a6a0601c17e7bb005bd4a6640005a45650702a58>- Professional Edition on centos 7

Here’s my interface stats.

*Received Packets*

        

93.74 GB [236,384,984 Pkts]

        

*Dropped Packets*

        

0 Pkts

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 04, 2015 10:41 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Ntop] Hardware requirements

Tasks:  94 total,   1 running,  93 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 10.6%us, 3.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 34.9%id, 45.4%wa, 0.0%hi, 5.6%si, 0.0%st
Mem:   2051056k total,  1978260k used,    72796k free, 1504k buffers
Swap:  2094076k total,  1063816k used,  1030260k free, 39088k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+ COMMAND
 1621 nobody    20   0 1609m 592m  15m D   55 29.6   2:45.03 ntopng
 1352 redis     20   0 1500m 596m  468 S    5 29.8   0:31.86 redis-server
25691 redis     20   0 1499m 1.1g  176 D    4 57.0   0:18.77 redis-server


Right now, in the iface with less traffic im having more than 68% of dropped packets and it is not showing the real bw usage.
In the iface with more traffic im having like 96.98% of dropped packets.

I've upgraded to the last version of nightly builds and in both interfaces Family is PF_RING.

My configuration is:

cor@ntopng:~$ cat /etc/ntopng/ntopng.conf
-n=3
-w=3010
-W=0
-m="84.*.*.0/23,185.*.*.0/22,5.*.*.0/24,94.*.*.0/24,178.*.*.0/24,178.*.*.0/24,185.*.*.0/22,185.*.*.0/22"
-A=1
-E=all
-D=all
-S=all
-X=524288
-x=262144
-d=/storage/ntopng
-C
-G=/var/tmp/ntopng.pid
-i=eth1
-i=eth2

And is made from nbox.

Thanks,

El 04/11/2015 a las 17:27, Joseph Jackson escribió:

    When host usage is 100% what is the process(s) that are causing
    the usage?  Is it ntopng or something else?

    *From:*[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Dpto.
    Datos Television Costa Blanca
    *Sent:* Wednesday, November 04, 2015 9:51 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [Ntop] Hardware requirements

    Hi Jospeh,

    host resource usage is 100% almost 100% of the time. I tried with
    and without PF_RING with same result.

    Capture NICs are Intel Corporation 82541GI Gigabit Ethernet Controller

    El 04/11/2015 a las 16:46, Joseph Jackson escribió:

        Whats the host resource usage when you are seeing the packet
        loss?  When you select the interface from ntop dashboard does
        it show it using PF_Ring?

        I have a box that captures on 2 10gig interfaces at around 30K
        pps (just a subset of traffic) but it’s a pretty beefy box.

        What is your capture nic?

        Joseph

        *From:*[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
        *Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca
        *Sent:* Wednesday, November 04, 2015 9:43 AM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [Ntop] Hardware requirements

        Hello?!

        Can anyone confirm my messages are showing correctly in the list?

        Thanks in advance!

        El 30/10/2015 a las 10:59, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca
        escribió:

            Hi all!

            Im bumping this. We want to buy the Pro version, but firts
            we want to test the community one.

            At this moment, we have a 4x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
            with 2Gb RAM and 35Gb SCSI RAID1 in Ubuntu 12.04

            We've installed nbox to control ntopng.

            With this configuration, we have more than 50% of packet
            drop and a few issues.

            While I have this: *8,436 Hosts*
            <http://185.29.68.24:3010/lua/hosts_stats.lua>*254
            Aggregations*
            <http://185.29.68.24:3010/lua/aggregated_hosts_stats.lua>*14,101
            Flows* <http://185.29.68.24:3010/lua/flows_stats.lua>

            If I go to Hosts -> Networks only 2 of my local networks
            appear while I have configured 8 local networks. The 2
            ones who appear in the Networks, are always the same (the
            2 first configured in the -m option) and if I go to Hosts
            -> Hosts, only 40 hosts appears in the list.

            In Flows, only 1825 flows appears.

            I'm doing something wrong? All that info was only
            monitoring 1 interface. If I setup to monitor the 2Gb
            interfaces, packetdrop grows and interface get really
            really slow.

            What kind of hardware do I need to monitor both
            interfaces? Or, maybe, what kind of hardware
            configuration? P.E. Do i need 3 servers, 2 for nprobes and
            1 for ntopng?

            We are planning to move to a 10G in the next year, so
            please, take that also into consideration.

            We know with the Pro version we can do some kind of
            traffic shaping, take that into consideration too.

            Without all that info, we cant buy the ntop licenses.

            Thanks in advance and Best Regards,

            El 27/10/2015 a las 18:06, Dpto. Datos Television Costa
            Blanca escribió:

                Hi All,

                What hardware or kind of configuration do you recommend for 
monitoring 2

                Gb interfaces (port mirror mode)?

                Thanks in advance!!!

                --Daniel

                _______________________________________________

                Ntop mailing list

                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>

                http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop







            _______________________________________________

            Ntop mailing list

            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

            http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop





        _______________________________________________

        Ntop mailing list

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop




    _______________________________________________

    Ntop mailing list

    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop



_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to