On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 02:55:55PM -0500, Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
> So, some comparison data is in order.
> 
> (I used nntp, not ftp - it's easier to get a steady measurable load)
> 
> CPU load (top): 0.7% to 1.5%
> Hardware: Pentium III 800 (100MHz FSB), ample free memory

I'm running on a mere Celeron 300. 

> Configuration: running solely as a monitor (i.e. the monitoring box is NOT
> the NAT/Firewall/Gateway).

Similar. There's only the ftp server. No NAT, firewalling or gateway.

> Average network load: 1300 Kbps
> Network configuration: Cable Modem, capped at 1500 Kbps (so that's
> effectively pegged...)

Connected to a 100mbit LAN. Usually gives ftp downloads at a rate of
about 9MB/s. Slowed down to 5MB/s when ntop is running.

> 
>   2:47pm  up 33 days, 20:20,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> 34 processes: 31 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states:  1.1% user,  1.3% system,  0.0% nice, 97.4% idle
> Mem:   125848K av,  121280K used,    4568K free,       0K shrd,   42196K
> buff
> Swap:  257032K av,    7700K used,  249332K free                   13916K
> cached

  9:59pm  up 6 days,  3:03,  1 user,  load average: 0.88, 0.21, 0.07
  46 processes: 41 sleeping, 5 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
  CPU states: 40.5% user, 58.2% system,  0.0% nice,  1.1% idle
  Mem:   255892K av,  252404K used,    3488K free,       0K shrd,   34552K buff
  Swap: 1024120K av,    3292K used, 1020828K free                  143256K cached

    PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
    12506 ftp       25   0  1196 1196   776 R    49.9  0.4   0:11 proftpd
    12505 ntop      25   0  8052 6204  1368 R    47.9  2.4   0:08 ntop
    12509 root      15   0  1024 1024   836 R     0.5  0.4   0:00 top

> If you are processor OR memory constrained, you are going to see a
> performance hit, of course...

I was supposing that 300Mhz should be able to handle this?
Is it possible to tweak ntop to improve performance? I don't really need
all the details (like I don't need protocol decoding, or tcp session handling).
The stable 2.0 release had a -A switch that enabled me to do this, but I
haven't found anything comparable in the current version?

-- 
Raiser, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ntop.org/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to