Yes, but read what he wrote - 2.2c - there are a lot of fixes in the cvs, so it's not surprising he's hitting problems.
You, OTOP, really should be testing 3.0pre2 now or the most current cvs version, not some older random cvs extract. -----Burton > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Stephan Knabe > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Ntop] How much uptime can you get? > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Nick Fisher wrote: > > > > Which platform? > > Doh! Sorry, I'm running it on a few different gentoo linux machines. > > > > > Linux - ntop goes on for weeks as long as you do not exhaust > > > memory (too many hosts) > > Intresting.... so ntop bombs when it needs more resources and can't have > > them? > > No it gets killed by the kernel (out of memory). I saw this happen on a > host with 256 MB RAM and 500MB Swap, when more than 50000 hosts were4 > stored. Using a box with 2 GB RAM it needs a maximum of about 300 MB. > > > > Windows - 4 hours on 2.2 is about right. With 3.0Pre1 we get up > > > to about 22 Hours > > OOOooo.... is 3 more stable on Win32 or just in general? Perhaps it uses > > less resources? > > > > > Usually uptime increases if you switch the RRD plugin OFF !?! > > Buh? Let me get this straight.... ntop in general is supposed > to work getter > > without rrd? Turning on rrd was the only way I got ntop to run > for over 6 > > hours. Could the rrd plugin perhaps reduce resource usage? > > > > I do not see this. I run it with rrd-plugin for a few weeks. I > only restarted it to read a new protocol list. Actually I have an uptime > of ca. 20.5 days. I use a CVS version from january, 5th. > > regards > > Stephan Knabe > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
