-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Burton M. Strauss III wrote:
| |>-----Original Message----- |>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Max |>Waterman |>Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:59 PM |>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |>Subject: Re: [Ntop] bug? |> |> |>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |>Hash: SHA1 |> |>Burton M. Strauss III wrote: |> |>| Clue: You've sent the exact same message three times with no reply. |> |>not true. the third time I got a reply. | | | Point: Max
I'm not here for points; just wanted someone to know about the (alleged) bug in the hope that it might be fixed.
But, if you're counting, it also wasn't the *exact same* message. The second contained a correction to a typo - which I thought might have been confusing people.
| | |>| |>| Either nobody cares |>| or people don't want to click on attachments to emails |> |>"attachments"? what attachments? I didn't send any attachments, as far |>as I can tell. | | | Attachments, links, etc. at this point in time, with pfishing, spam, fake | sites, most people don't click on ANYTHING in an email message unless it's | something they are expecting from somebody they know. Most admins are | trying to train their users, friends, parents, etc. - DON'T CLICK... | period.
Well, I might understand this if I hadn't posted to this in the past - I had even helped by pointing out a likely fix to a bug reported by someone else. Admitted, it was likely using a different email address, but my name hasn't changed - actually, the username part of the address is even the same. So some casual checking may have shown me to be 'OK' - even a little research into the website might have increased your confidence, if you cared to bother (and I, in no way, suggest that you should bother).
| So try using words to describe the problem.
Yes, I suppose my words were a little brief, but, in my mind, the image to which I referred said it all - page numbers, version numbers etc etc. I really hadn't considered that some would prefer not to follow a link (in this way, I suppose attaching an image would have been better - but you won't catch me doing that since *I* really hate them).
|>I guess I shall just assume it is a bug and report it to |><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. | | Same people read both (or more precisely, there's fewer ntop-dev readers - | those who follow the cvs tip).
Ah, fair enough. I shalln't bother then, though I might follow the man page's suggestions more closely next time (it says to use the -dev list).
For the record, I didn't find your response to be *that* rude. I'm not a newby (perhaps to this list, depending on your definition), so I've had a lot worse. Terse, perhaps. I suspect it might offend some though.
Max. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFArgM44frZ3W7OHZMRAlBXAJwLsie0t/h7i9sl4Tdxswk+i5Oa2gCePJ76 QcXjP240FVrIaKaFJ1v4BHs= =nAqH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
