Johannes, it's very strange, it seems that ntop has been compiled with local dependencies.
Have you tried the demo version<http://www.ntop.org/demo/ntop/win32/ntop-3.3-demo.exe>of ntop ? Fabio 2008/6/12 Johannes Prost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Yuri, > > yes I did start ntop from the commandline and I didn't got any warnings, > except the > complain about missing files, the ones I mentioned. To get the problem > fixed with > packet.dll I executed : copy %windir%\system32\packet.dll packet from > c:\ntop > > The funny thing is that I did the exceact same routine on both NT4 with the > same > self compiled package. And I had the same complaines about the missing > files. > This is really wired. > > Johannes > > > Johannes > > afaik everything should be "self contained" in the package. You > > shouldn't need anything else. > > Maybe you have already answered to this question but, did you start ntop > > from the command line instead from the service panel? > > Yuri > > > > > On 06/12/2008 04:19 AM, Johannes Prost wrote: > >> Here are my test results as promised: > >> > >> 1. own compiled version 3.2.2 still the same problem as described below; > pngs > >> without any description, dots at the bottom left but data graphs are > printed. On > >> the other NT4 install with the same package NO problem. Same browser > (FF)with > >> remote access to problem install & install which is well. > >> > >> 2. installed Openxtra package (already 2 days ago), to my surprise all > pngs are > >> fine. Same browser (FF) with remote access. BUT to my surprise a small > glitch > >> happened: The first call with the browser, the openxtra package gave me > on the > >> Traffic summary page 2 pngs out of 3 (Traffic typ) without description > as > >> described > >> in point 1 above. The History png ( Global Protocol Distribution) of > this summary > >> page was fine. > >> After that, I opened the Historical Data link and all pngs were fine. > Going back > >> to > >> the Traffic Summary page, the 2 pngs out of 3, which were not proper by > opening > >> the > >> first time, were now fine too. > >> > >> Openening the pages after that, I didn't had any problem. All pngs were > fine. > >> > >> My questions: > >> Which files are used to bring up the pngs ? > >> Are there any dependencies outside of ntop, except for packet.dll, > wanpacket.dll, > >> npptools.dll, msvcrt71.dll ? I had to copy those files to \system32. > >> > >> Johannes > >> > >>>> Johannes, > >>>> Have you tried to access ntop remotely, using the browser of the > system that > >>>> work well? > >>>> > >>> Yes, mostly remotely and for curiosity locally to. It was the same > result. > >>> It's so odd. > >>> > >>> I will make a new install once more tonight and will post results. > >>> I have also the Openxtra package here and will try that,if the problems > >>> persists. > >>> The current installations are all self compiled packages. > >>> > >>> Johannes > >>> > >>> > >>>> Fabio > >>>> > >>>> 2008/6/11 Johannes Prost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> > >>>>>> Johannes > >>>>>> on the systems with problems, are you using the same browser you use > >>>>>> on those systems that work well? > >>>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I do. FF 2.00.14 > >>>>> > >>>>> Johannes > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers Luca > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:37 AM, Johannes Prost wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> this is my first post to the list, please bear with me. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I got 3 installations (Nt4, XP)of ntop sucessfully running. With > one > >>>>>>> I have the > >>>>>>> following problem and I am lost where the problem could be. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> NTop 3.2.2 on NT4, one of 2 NT4 with problems. > >>>>>>> Problem: > >>>>>>> the .pngs are created but without any descriptions at all. The data > >>>>>>> bars are > >>>>>>> printed. Below on the left of the main graph field are only black > >>>>>>> dots where the > >>>>>>> traffic desription should be. The time interval and axes > >>>>>>> descriptions are blank, > >>>>>>> nothing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Even after reinstalling, same result. Has someone any ideas what > >>>>>>> could cause this > >>>>>>> odd behavior ? > >>>>>>> The other installations on xp and on NT4 are just perfect. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Johannes > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Ntop mailing list > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Ntop mailing list > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Ntop mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Ntop mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Ntop mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ntop mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > > > > -- > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > Yuri Francalacci > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.ntop.org/ > > *** Esse Quam Videri -- To Be, Rather Than To Seem *** > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > _______________________________________________ > > Ntop mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
