There are almost an infinite combination of possible bits of hardware you could 
purchase.

My suggestion is you get some requirements - here are some categories that 
might assist you in gathering:

a)      End user capabilities/experience

b)      Interfaces, integration and interoperability

c)      Performance

d)      Capacity/Scalability

e)      Security

f)       Business continuity/recovery

g)      Availability

h)      Audit & compliance

i)       Support & Maintenance

j)       Operating Model

k)      Cross-functional & Other

Work out /what/ you need first, then you can work out /how/ you meet that need.

Cheers
Ken

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Monday, 24 June 2013 12:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server-Budget Update

 i just figured getting the r3412 there would be no need for the VRTX- but if 
you have alternate options- PLEASE share











Jean-Paul Natola


> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:46:31 -0700
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server-Budget Update
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:12 PM, J- P 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > So , somehow the client doubled the budget to 10k
> >
> > So I am looking at the synology 3412RPxs
> >
> > and I am debating weather to purchase a new host box- or upgrade the the 
> > curent r300 to a full 24gb of ram-
> >
> > this would allow me to add at least another 3 guests- as i do not need 
> > storage on it due to having the synology 3412
> >
> > So I would have in the end
> >
> > Host A win 2012 with 2 guests
> >
> > guest 1) Exchange 2013 with 16gb ram
> > guest 2) 2012 DC 4gb
> >
> > Host B) VShere (24 gb ram)
> >
> > Guest 1) 2008 citrix / TS 2 gb ram
> >
> > Guest 2) 2012 DC 2 gb ram
> >
> > Guest 3) 2012 print/ file server (16 gb ram ) with ISCSCI data held on 
> > synology
> >
> >
> > Physical server - running 2003 with sql 2005 (currently in existence- if 
> > aint broke don't fix it)
> >
> > The only thing I would like for additional redundancy is have another SQL 
> > on "standby" and another Exchange on standby- Not sure how the licensing 
> > works on that
> >
> > Any feedback would be GREATLY appreciated
>
> I hadn't been aware of the Dell VRTX units before this conversation,
> and they seem extremely attractive for this situation.
>
> Kurt
>
>

Reply via email to