But, but, but... One of the benefits of the pure cloud is that it's all taken care of for you. You're all strategy, all the time. No tactics required.[1]
[1] Sysadmins, either. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Ziots, Edward <[email protected]> wrote: > No not problem solved, with moving to cloud, if not done right, makes > into bigger problem. As for the offline comment, if there is sensitive > internal information to discuss it would be better in an offline convers, > but if its just general of course best for all to learn online. **** > > ** ** > > Z**** > > ** ** > > Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, CISA, Security +, Network +**** > > Security Engineer**** > > Lifespan Organization**** > > [email protected]**** > > Work:401-255-2497**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and > confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are reading this > message, but are not the intended recipient, nor an employee or agent > responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from copying, printing, > forwarding or otherwise disseminating this communication. If you have > received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender > by replying to the message. Then, delete the message from your computer. > Thank you.**** > > *[image: Description: Description: Lifespan]* > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Richard Stovall > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2013 4:00 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Think strategically, not tactically..**** > > ** ** > > I thought the only valid long-term strategy is to 'go to the cloud.'**** > > ** ** > > Boom! Problem solved.**** > > ** ** > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:*** > * > > No, please - not offline. > > This is an outstanding opportunity for learning for all of us as sysadmins. > **** > > Kurt**** > > ** ** > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Ziots, Edward <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Dave, **** > > **** > > What is the situation at hand that you need to get things across to the > business at a strategic level as compared to tactical day to day level. ** > ** > > **** > > The approaches are varied, depending on the audience and the priorites. > (Corporate mergers, Compliance/Regulations issues, Bussiness drivers, etc > etc) **** > > **** > > Hit me offline and we can discuss more, **** > > **** > > Z**** > > **** > > Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, CISA, Security +, Network +**** > > Security Engineer**** > > Lifespan Organization**** > > [email protected]**** > > Work:401-255-2497**** > > **** > > **** > > This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and > confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are reading this > message, but are not the intended recipient, nor an employee or agent > responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from copying, printing, > forwarding or otherwise disseminating this communication. If you have > received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender > by replying to the message. Then, delete the message from your computer. > Thank you.**** > > *[image: Description: Description: Lifespan]***** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David Lum > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:32 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Think strategically, not tactically..**** > > **** > > So….I need to come up with a way to better approach some situations and > think more strategically and less tactically. When it comes to systems > management (servers, endpoints, troubleshooting, etc.), what does that look > like? Can someone shoot some examples out?**** > > **** > > Brain cramp. Sure I can Google this, but let’s pretend I work for you and > am asking for guidance J.**** > > **** > > Dave.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
<<image001.jpg>>
