What does the version of Exchange Product Use Rights they are using say?
These would be considered shared mailboxes?

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] SOT: Letter from MS, legitimacy ?

 

So I started my audit on the client site with Exchange, and I noticed that
they created all mail accounts as user mailboxes;
For instance, warehouse@, jobs@ , dropbox@, voicemail@ etc...

My question is will this be scrutinized and will MS say "it's a user box,
therefore it requires a CAL"? 

 
 



  _____  

From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] SOT: Letter from MS, legitimacy ?
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:58:15 +0000

Doesn't matter.  
Buried in the legalese of license agreements, MS states that they can
request this info at any time. And all associated costs are the customer's
responsibility.

As long as you are not intentionally violating their licensing, they are not
out to punish/fine you - just get you legit.

In any case, good luck.

Source: went through this exact thing in '12.

 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:38 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] SOT: Letter from MS, legitimacy ?

 

One thing I'm sure the client will note is;

"MS_Rep_Name" will contact Business_Name to discuss the internal self audit,
SHOULD YOUR ORG ELECT TO ENGAGE OUTSIDE RESOURCES O ASSIST YOU IN THE
INTERNAL AUDIT MICROSOFT NOT FUND THOSE RESOURCES"



  
Jean-Paul Natola
 

  _____  

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] SOT: Letter from MS, legitimacy ?
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:28:03 +0000

Vs. doing it free? Absolutely.

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:05 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] SOT: Letter from MS, legitimacy ?

 

Being a consultant to them, would you make this a billable task?

  
Jean-Paul Natola
 

  _____  

Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:56:23 -0400
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] SOT: Letter from MS, legitimacy ?

Be prepared for a hair pulling experience.  When we did the "It's not an
audit, we're here to 

help you manage your licenses" they ended up doing lots of aggravating
things.  Stuff like

not wanting to accept the idea that OEM XP licenses on a bunch of old HP
machines were 

valid since neither our accounting or the reseller's records went back far
enough to be

able to produce an invoice. I think they finally dropped that when we came
up with an

email acknowledgement from the purchase and took pictures of a number of the
COA

stickers on some of the boxes.  Then there was them saying we needed to
purchase

something like 20 cores of SQL Server 2012. We were running 2008r2, properly
licensed

and even with the 2012 transition, we were still properly licensed. I ended
up quoting them

the relevant sections from the SQL 2012 licensing document about a dozen
times before

they got it. There was several other dumb things. 

 

I've heard that this is being driven from the sales side of Microsoft as a
revenue enhancement

tool. I didn't see anything that would make me think that's not the case. 

 

 

 

 

  _____  

Hi all

 

One of my new clients called me and said they received a letter via Fedex
from MS, regarding licensing. In my 15+ years I have never had that occur
before , I asked them to email me the letter so I can take a look at it.

 

They only recently (within the last year) gone to Volume Licensing for
Windows/Exchange/outlook and TS cals/licensing, all desktops are desktops
are OEM licensed.
 
They are also  a small company (maybe 40 desktops ) and a handful of
servers.

 

Has anyone on here ever been contacted in this manner?
  

 

  
Jean-Paul Natola
 

 

 

-- 

Thanks,

 

Joe Matuscak | Director of Technology
Rohrer Corporation | Office: 330-335-1541
717 Seville Road | Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
www.rohrer.com <http://www.rohrer.com>  | A Better Package


.


Reply via email to