Back in the day, there were companies selling such RAM optimization tools.

Thanks


Webster


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Lum
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Defrag and SSD's
> 
> Right. If it mattered that much shouldn't they have a RAM defrag tool too?
> I can't see the gain - especially on a typical office worker machine where
> they're using email, web browser, and office apps and maybe a LOB app and
> not much else.
> 
> "We spent $50/machine/ye (if you include the admin time to install and
> monitor this app, as well as outright licensing. No clue on licensing cost
> actually) to save 43 seconds/yr/employee waiting for their PC to retrieve
> data..."
> 
> > Its never been a question if fragmentation happens on an SSD. It does.
> > The question is whether or not its worth de-fragmenting:
> >
> >
> >    1. Are you getting a worthwhile performance gain?
> >    2. Is the effort required deteriorating ROI due to user interference or
> >    shortened MTF in a cost-prohibitive manner?
> >
> >
> > Everything I have read indicates that it significantly hurts the MTF,
> > and the performance gain is negligible.  ROI of course can vary
> > greatly depending on what you are doing with the equipment, and what
> > that means to you fiscally.  So, it is possible that defrag'ing an SSD
> > is a worthwhile investment.
> >
> > I would imagine that is something akin to the way [fraudulent]
> > investors short the stock market by paying for their analytical
> > servers to be physically closer to the Exchange's servers.  Thus
> > gaining micro-seconds of advantage for every trade.
> >
> > --
> > Espi
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Dave Lum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Truth, or salesmanship?
> >> http://www.condusiv.com/knowledge-
> center/videos/videos.aspx?index=13
> >>
> >> I wonder if the actual productivity increase would more than pay for
> >> the product.
> >>
> >> Dave "skeptical"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to