Remember that a SSD is a cluster of storage cells that the management program in
the SSD maps to the drive image that the OS driver sees.

 

Defragging the drive from the PC OS does not physically sequence the data in
those cells, it causes the storage management facility on the drive itself to go
through the (to it) arduous process of copying cells of data to other cells,
adjusting the physical to logical map,  and then erasing the data from the cell
'cleared'

Erasure and writing may possibly take 4 times as long as a read, and actually
reduces the life of the 'erased' data storage cell as well as the storage used
for the physical to logical map.

 

Defrag  originally had a triple benefit:

 

Avoid head movement delays while disparate parts of the file were read -

Does not apply to SSD's

 

Avoid extra reads of the space allocation table required to assemble a list of
the locations of the data on the drive - 

Not particularly relevant on drives with large cache, and systems with gigabytes
of real memory

 

Collect the FAT directory entries into a single block of storage of the drive
(usually ordered, and clustered with other directory lists) -

Certainly does not apply under NTFS  where all the entries are assembled as
detailed by MS and according to the space available within the MFT, and the
file's creation full name.

And I have been told that Windows will do some compression/tidy up work on the
MFT as a background task

 

 

So - I'd say defrag of a SSD is actually more likely to cause the system to be
slower, than to be faster!

 

But then again, that's only my understanding!

 

JimB 

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 8:00 PM
To: ntsysadm
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Defrag and SSD's

 

Its never been a question if fragmentation happens on an SSD. It does. The
question is whether or not its worth de-fragmenting:

1.      Are you getting a worthwhile performance gain?
2.      Is the effort required deteriorating ROI due to user interference or
shortened MTF in a cost-prohibitive manner?

 

Everything I have read indicates that it significantly hurts the MTF, and the
performance gain is negligible.  ROI of course can vary greatly depending on
what you are doing with the equipment, and what that means to you fiscally.  So,
it is possible that defrag'ing an SSD is a worthwhile investment.

I would imagine that is something akin to the way [fraudulent] investors short
the stock market by paying for their analytical servers to be physically closer
to the Exchange's servers.  Thus gaining micro-seconds of advantage for every
trade.




--
Espi

 

 

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Dave Lum <[email protected]> wrote:

Truth, or salesmanship?
http://www.condusiv.com/knowledge-center/videos/videos.aspx?index=13

I wonder if the actual productivity increase would more than pay for the
product.

Dave "skeptical"




 


Reply via email to