Define cost-effective? An HP microserver with a few SATA drives, a copy of windows server and DFS This is the only real option for you if you want them to continue to work (as in read/write) and when the dead server is alive, things just magically work As for robocopy synctoy et al, a far better imnsho is Robocopy from http://www.2brightsparks.com/freeware/freeware-hub.html http://www.2brightsparks.com/syncback/compare.html The SE version gives you versioning ($35)
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:16 AM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > For a small office (10 users) , i want to have a secondary storage device > that syncs with server share, so that in the event the the server goes > down (power supply goes, memory failure etc..), they can continue to work > till the server comes back online. > > They are too small to justify the expense of second physical server, any > thoughts? > > thanks > > >
