DoH! I meant a far better* option, * imnsho is *Syncback....*
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Dean Cunningham <[email protected] > wrote: > Define cost-effective? > An HP microserver with a few SATA drives, a copy of windows server and DFS > This is the only real option for you if you want them to continue to work > (as in read/write) and when the dead server is alive, things just magically > work > As for robocopy synctoy et al, a far better imnsho is Robocopy from > http://www.2brightsparks.com/freeware/freeware-hub.html > http://www.2brightsparks.com/syncback/compare.html > The SE version gives you versioning ($35) > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:16 AM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> For a small office (10 users) , i want to have a secondary storage device >> that syncs with server share, so that in the event the the server goes >> down (power supply goes, memory failure etc..), they can continue to work >> till the server comes back online. >> >> They are too small to justify the expense of second physical server, any >> thoughts? >> >> thanks >> >> >> >
