I try to keep the needs of the business in mind. ;)
- WJR 🙈🙉🙊 On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr < [email protected]> wrote: > Awesome - and cost effective! > > -- > Espi > > > > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:57 PM, William Robbins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sorry Ben for stepping on your turf...but I felt this apposite in this >> discussion. Oh, and IMHO, bringing up anything from Steve Gibson in a >> security discussion is on par w/Godwin's Law. >> >> http://xkcd.com/538/ >> >> >> - WJR >> 🙈🙉🙊 >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Your version of impractical is different than mine. Or that of the NSA. >>> >>> >>> >>> Generating rainbow tables that contain hashes for all possible passwords >>> of say, 24 characters, may be computationally intractable today (and may >>> not be, depending on your resources), but a 95% success rate does not >>> require tables that contain all hashes. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Klaus Hartnegg >>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:09 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Cc:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Re: Something to share with your users, so >>> they can see how passwords matter >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 09.08.2014 um 05:23 schrieb "Michael B. Smith" <[email protected] >>> >: >>> >>> you should spend some time learning how Rainbow Tables operate. >>> >>> Rainbow tables don't work at all if the password has sufficient length. >>> >>> They are magic for 8 characters, but impractical for 10 or more. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
