I'd say yes
Despatched via Blackberry. Mock if you will, but it gets my email without a fuss. -----Original Message----- From: J- P <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:14:51 To: NT<[email protected]> Reply-to: [email protected] Subject: [NTSysADM] Size on Disk HUGE discrepancy Hi all, this may seem trivial ,however, this particular situation has me concerned; We have a photo archive that's been around for about 15 years- it started on a 2k server, moved to a 2003,2008 and now its on a 2012r2 server. I know the norm is that the "size on disk" would be a bit bigger than "size" due to file system, cluster size etc.. but in this case its the reverse, and by A LOT, and NO, compression is not enabled The directory 112 Gb, and contains 20,029 files and 414 folders, now size on disk only reports 26.3 MB (27,607,040 bytes) thats MEGS, NOT GIGS Is this something to be alarmed with?
