I'm going to bet you have deduplication turned on. If so, this is a known um...issue. Do an Internet search on "deduplication size mismatch" or some such thing.
I ran into this just two weeks ago, and it was 2012R2 dedupe that was the "culprit". If you don't have dedupe on, then I don't know what it might be. Dave > Hi all, > > this may seem trivial ,however, this particular situation has me > concerned; > > We have a photo archive that's been around for about 15 years- it started > on a 2k server, moved to a 2003,2008 and now its on a 2012r2 server. > > I know the norm is that the "size on disk" would be a bit bigger than > "size" due to file system, cluster size etc.. > but in this case its the reverse, and by A LOT, and NO, compression is not > enabled > > The directory 112 Gb, and contains 20,029 files and 414 folders, now size > on disk only reports 26.3 MB (27,607,040 bytes) thats MEGS, NOT GIGS > > Is this something to be alarmed with? > > > > >
